It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that younger
generations of doctors are poorly trained and that an intelligent individual
researching for themselves, is often better informed than the GP that they see.
I read somewhere that the only thing medical students are
taught about vaccines are schedules and that few if any would take the time to
find out, how they are made, what they contain and what they are designed to
do. The word vaccine is in allopathic medicine today, the equivalent of the
Holy Wafer, something to be accepted without question as a matter of blind
faith.
This blind obsession with vaccines rides on the back of
materialist reductionist mechanistic science and the deluded belief that health
resides in some magic pill, potion or needle and Death and Disease can be
thwarted through chemical means and the manipulations of mere mortals.
Doctors today work under the Rumsfeld doctrine - they don't
know what they don't know and they don't know that they don't know. On the
subject of vaccines they are brainwashed and the vaccine industry is a cult.
Reading the histories of infectious diseases and the massive
changes made by improved living conditions provides perspective no longer
taught in medical schools.
In 1977, Boston University epidemiologists John and Sonja
McKinlay published a seminal work on the role vaccines (and other medical
interventions) played in the massive decline in mortality seen in the twentieth
century.
The McKinlay’s study was titled, “The Questionable
Contribution of Medical Measures to the Decline of Mortality in the United
States in the Twentieth Century.” Their data showed:
<b>“that the introduction of specific medical measures
and/or the expansion of medical services are generally not responsible for most
of the modern decline in mortality.”</b>
In 1970, Dr Edward H. Kass, of Harvard, gave a speech to the
annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, of which he was
then President. He warned his colleagues that drawing false conclusions about
why mortality rates had declined so much could cause them to focus on the wrong
things.
He said:
“…we had accepted some half truths and had stopped searching
for the whole truths.
The principal half truths were that medical research had
stamped out the great killers of the past —tuberculosis, diphtheria, pneumonia,
puerperal sepsis, etc. —and that medical research and our superior system of
medical care were major factors extending life expectancy, thus providing the
American people with the highest level of health available in the world.
That these are half truths is known but is perhaps not as
well known as it should be.”
<b>
Macfarlane Burnet, Nobel Prize laureate for immunology,
suggested over half a century ago that genetics, nutrition, psychological and
environmental factors (ecological medicine) may play a more important role in
resistance to disease than the assumed benefits of artificial immunity induced
by vaccination procedures (Burnet 1952 p106). </b>
He suggested that in years to come society may have to
reassess the belief scientists were placing in vaccination.
He considered that genetic deterioration of the population
may be a consequence of universal mass vaccination campaigns and he postulated
that ‘some of our modern successes in preventative and curative medicine may on
the longest view be against the best interests of the state’ (Burnet 1952
p107). Burnet (1952) believed that genetic constitution was the most important
hidden variable in disease statistics.
<i>Early in the last century, measles killed millions
of people a year. Then, bit by bit in countries of the developed world, the
death rate dropped, by the 1960s by 98% or more. In the U.K., it dropped by an
astounding 99.96%. And then, the measles vaccine entered the market.</i>
https://financialpost.com/opinion/lawrence-solomon-the-untold-story-of-measles
