Any
Government would have to be very careful about mandatory vaccination.
We
are already seeing more and more people questioning vaccines which to my mind
is a good thing given how they are made, what they contain and what they are
designed to do. Most people have little idea and their doctors and nurses have
even less.
I
don't believe in conspiracies, but, systems drive behaviour, and, in the
Allopathic medical system, it is dogma that vaccines are safe and the ability
to question them does not exist, let alone identifying, recognising or
admitting that someone has been harmed by them.
Even
in countries like the US and UK which have vaccine injury compensation
programmes, it is estimated the majority of injuries are overlooked if not
simply denied.
The
more people know about vaccines the more cautious many will become. Most of
those summarily dismissed as anti-vaxxers were once pro-vaxxers and did as they
were told, until they or a child was injured, or someone they loved died
because of vaccines. Then they began to research and when that happens, there
is no turning back.
Are
people truly comfortable with the thought that they, let alone their babies and
children, will be injected with a brew of animal, human and bird material,
along with a cocktail of synthetic chemicals and DNA which has been 'altered'
in diseases and in general? Do we truly know what the long-term effects may be
of combining animal, human and bird material, messing around with genes and
injecting it into the human body might do?
It
used to be said that to fully know outcomes science-medicine required two
generations to grow up living relatively normal lives, the first giving birth
to the second. If we take 70 as a reasonable age, that makes 140 years and
since the max-vax age began about 40 years ago, we have around a century to go.
Or, in wiser times, we would have done. All such caution has now been thrown to
the wind in the name of hubris and greed.
And
how about the process for which a vaccine is designed? To confuse and trick the
immune system, in the case of anyone under 14, an immature immune system, into
reacting to a non-threat. How can that be good? Do we really benefit from an
easily confused immune system? How can we if a confused cell is what we call
Cancerous?
Oh,
and there has been and is talk and who knows it may be happening, about using
Cancer cells in vaccine manufacture. They last longer, don't die as easily and
it saves money. Can that possibly be without risk?
But,
anyone who begins to discover these facts is going to ask more questions. Any
mandatory vaccine will accelerate that process even more than is happening
already. If they want people to remain uninformed, gullible, fearful and easily
manipulated so they can keep vaccinating like maniacs, and shovelling in the
money, then they need to proceed with caution on any vaccine and drop the idea
for mandatory.
Even
coercion is not going to work for a rushed-through vaccine, for a disease which
is little threat to most people.
I
would like to see the end of the max-vax age but I doubt the vaccine nazis in
science, medicine, pharma and government would, so I am sure there will be some
sane voices of reason on the issue, to quell dissent and calm the masses.
Little
was done to warn people during the Fifties Polio epidemic that vaccinating
children for Diptheria and other diseases during this time, predisposed them to
Severe Paralytic Polio, paralysis usually beginning at the injection site. An
article, discussing this, by Kevin Norbury, Suffer
The
Little Children, was published by The Age some years ago but is now no longer
available online. Why would that be?
Having
copied and filed the article, as one must in regard to vaccine information, I
can post here the following:
Quote:
.......The Lancet in April 1950 linking polio with whooping cough and
diphtheria immunisation.
The
revelatory research, as it happens, was done by Dr Bertram McCloskey, the
Victorian Health Department’s polio officer. His report in The Lancet makes
disturbing reading, even today. McCloskey reports that 375 cases of polio were
notified in Victoria between January and August 1949, and of the 340 cases
investigated, 211 of these had ”a history of previous immunisation against
whooping cough and/or diphtheria”. This showed, he wrote, that there was
”considerable evidence that a correlation between inoculation and poliomyelitis
infection existed in this epidemic”.
Some
warnings were given and the situation is now discussed as Polio Provovation,
but little was done to halt or limit vaccination because those in control did
not want to diminish public faith in vaccines.
A
few dead or paralysed kids is a small price, it seems, if public faith in the
cult-like dogma of vaccination is maintained. So, don't kid yourselves that
those pushing vaccines care,even if they continue to spout their 'good
intentions.' And sure, vaccination was initially developed because of good
intentions, but has become fanatical purely in the name of less noble
qualities.
There
is so much ego, power, prestige, money, faith invested in vaccines that any
suggestion vaccines are dangerous, which they are, will threaten that pyramid
scheme significantly. And then what? Compensating all those already harmed by
vaccines?
But,
hey, it is only the future of our children and humanity which is at stake if we
fail to ask questions and demand answers and accountability.
